Will Low Volatility Mean Lower Risk Next Time?

Well, it's official. According to Ned Davis Research, this is now the longest period in history without the S&P 500 experiencing a correction of 3% or more. For those of you keeping score at home, NDR tells us that as of Monday's close, it has now been 262 market days since the last time the S&P pulled back by at least 3%. The current run breaks the previous record of 256 days set back in 1995.

To put this feat into perspective, consider that since 1928, the S&P has experienced a correction of at least 3% every 22 trading days (or about once a month) on average. It is for this reason that pullbacks of 3% or more are often referred to as "garden variety" affairs.

In case you were wondering (I was), this is also the 4th longest period in history without a 5% correction, the 10th longest stretch without a 10% correction, and the 2nd longest span since early-1928 without a 20% correction (aka a "bear market") for the S&P 500.

When these fun facts are added to the market's lofty valuation levels - many of which are either near or above historic highs - it is little wonder that so many financial advisors are nervous about the outlook for the stock market these days.

Sure, the economy appears to be picking up steam. Yes, earnings are strong. It is true that rates are low and inflation doesn't appear to be a threat. And no, the Fed isn't likely to go on the war path anytime soon. Thus, it is fairly easy to argue that the market's underlying fundamentals are pretty darn good.

Yet, investors and advisors alike remain nervous. The bottom line is nobody wants to get fooled again. No one ever wants to watch their 401K turn into a 201K the way they did during the crisis.

So, what have investors/advisors done to try and take less risk during this long bull run? From my seat, it appears they've plowed money into what have historically been lower risk plays such as high dividend paying companies and the so-called "low volatility" areas.

In fact, "low volatility" has become one of the popular factor-plays in stock picking. This is probably due to the fact that the low vol space has outperformed the broad market. According to PIMCO, the low volatility factor beat the CRSP/Compustat universe of U.S. stocks by 1.6% per year from 7/31/1968 through 6/30/2017.

View Larger Image Online

And as I've detailed in previous missives, the folks at BlackRock contend that focusing on the low volatility factor can reduce risk over time.

So, it is little wonder that investors who are nervous about the stock market would choose a low volatility approach.

The Fly in the Ointment

Such an approach has become very popular these days. Very, very popular.

So popular, in fact, that, according to PIMCO, the valuation measure for the low volatility factor currently resides in the 88th percentile.

As the chart below illustrates, the valuation level for the "low vol" factor is even higher (a lot higher) than the momentum factor - where the go-go stocks like the "FANGs" can be found.

View Larger Image Online

In their research report dated November 2017, PIMCO suggests that "valuations matter" when considering factor investing. "An expensive starting point reduces future return prospects," the report contends.

My point on this fine Tuesday morning is one needs to beware of crowded trades - especially when they reach extremes. In other words, if the bears were to find a reason to occupy Wall Street for a spell in the near future, those low volatility and high dividend plays may not provide the protection that is expected. I can even argue that the opposite might even occur if "the crowd" heads to the exits in these ETFs - all at the same time.

Is this a reason not to employ low volatility or high divy factors in portfolios? No, absolutely not. However, it is yet another good reason to diversify your investing approach in a modern fashion.

Thought For The Day:

The most rewarding things you do in life are often the ones that look like they cannot be done. -Arnold Palmer

Current Market Drivers

We strive to identify the driving forces behind the market action on a daily basis. The thinking is that if we can understand why stocks are doing what they are doing on a short-term basis; we are not likely to be surprised/blind-sided by a big move. Listed below are what we believe to be the driving forces of the current market (Listed in order of importance).

1. The State of Tax Reform

2. The State of the Earnings Season

3. The State of the Economy

Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,

David D. Moenning
Chief Investment Officer
Sowell Management Services

Disclosure: At the time of publication, Mr. Moenning and/or Sowell Management Services held long positions in the following securities mentioned: none. Note that positions may change at any time.


The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning is an investment adviser representative of Sowell Management Services, a registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services, review the firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available by contacting Sowell. Sowell is not registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Sowell may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Positions may change at any time.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

Advisory services are offered through Sowell Management Services.

Posted to State of the Markets on Nov 21, 2017 — 9:11 AM
Comments ({[comments.length]})
Sort By:
Loading Comments
No comments. Break the ice and be the first!
Error loading comments Click here to retry
No comments found matching this filter
Want to add a comment? Take me to the new comment box!